Tasmanian premier rubbishes suggestions AFL stadium cannot be built

A concept design for an AFL stadium at Macquarie Point.

The Tasmanian government insists a roofed stadium at Macquarie Point can, and will, be built amidst growing geo-technical, height and engineering concerns.

On Saturday, Premier Jeremy Rockliff dismissed suggestions that a 23,000-seat, roofed stadium could not be built on the site at a price tag of $715 million, declaring his government had “factored in” potentially problematic site conditions, and had “contingency” for build and cost overruns “should they be required.”

The premier said he was aware of a 2015 report compiled by Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering firm Douglas Partners for the Macquarie Point Development Corporation (MPDC), that found fill on the site had “poor geotechnical properties”.

It said that heavier structures more than one to two storeys high would require piles to be driven 18 metres deep into bedrock.

“All of these have been factored in and considered and we will work through engineering matters as we well know,” he said.

“I’m excited about the build and getting on with the job.

“The only thing in the way of our own AFL and AFLW team is the knockers and the blockers.”

Macquarie Point and the Hobart CBD from the air, including the location of the proposed AFL stadium. April 2023.(ABC News: Maren Preuss)

In May, the government signed an agreement with the AFL that committed it to constructing a 23,000-seat, roofed stadium at Macquarie Point, as part of its deal for a license to play in the AFL and AFLW from 2028.

The premier said he rejected the notion that the 2015 report cast doubt on the suitability of Macquarie Point as a site for the new stadium.

“I would not agree with that. We’ve factored in all the challenges, and we’ve got contingency, of course,” he said.

A spokesperson for Macquarie Point Development Corporation (MPDC), which received the report in 2015, said extensive geotech investigations had been undertaken since remediation of the site began that year, and that “these do not infer that a stadium development would be unstable or could not proceed.”

The MPDC also dispelled concerns from the state’s Labor opposition about groundwater at a depth of 2.5 metres, and that the south-west corner of the site “is at significant risk of level 4 contamination, the highest EPA level.”

Author: Ivan Robinson